Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2202 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Tanks than Celeron 3965U - 582 vs 504 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 7600
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
