The FX-4130 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's £99.79 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 86% cheaper – £16.87 vs £116.66
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-9100F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
FX-4130 vs Core i3-9100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, £
£116.66
14%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
16%
FX-4130 vs Core i3-9100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$112.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
