Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2505 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4130 - 190 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |