The Core i9-13900 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-6400, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's £623.77 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-6400
- Up to 94% cheaper – £41.93 vs £665.70
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i9-13900 vs Core i5-6400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, £
£665.7
6%
Value, £/FPS
£3.09/FPS
7%
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
180
84%
Min 1% FPS
120
85%
Price, £
£41.93
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900 vs Core i5-6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900 vs Core i5-6400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900 vs Core i5-6400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
$549.00 | MSRP | $182.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |