The Core i5-6400 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G4900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-6400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
Core i5-6400 vs Celeron G4900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
170
94%
Min 1% FPS
114
95%
Price, £
£59.75
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Core i5-6400 vs Celeron G4900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6400 vs Celeron G4900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6400 vs Celeron G4900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-6400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | $42.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
