Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900KF - 442 vs 414 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £109.99 vs £424.09
- Up to 75% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900KF - £0.25 vs £1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £424.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
442
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |