Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £198.86 vs £416.35
- Up to 48% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-13900K - £0.65 vs £1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-11400F - 336 vs 307 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
307
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£198.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £198.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3373 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
336
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.24/FPS
52%
Price, £
£416.35
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for £416.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3373 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |