Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £117.95 vs £432.97
- Up to 70% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-14900K - £0.93 vs £3.14 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 9% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-11400F - 138 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£117.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £117.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.14/FPS
30%
Price, £
£432.97
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for £432.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |