The Core i5-7500T is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-7500T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
The Core i5-7500T is better in every way
Core i5-7500T vs Celeron G3900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
94%
Min 1% FPS
114
95%
Price, £
£121.07
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.71/FPS
100%
Core i5-7500T vs Celeron G3900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7500T vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7500T vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-7500T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |