Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 2407 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5500 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3900 - 280 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - £84.00 vs £119.95
- Up to 40% better value when playing Ready or Not than Celeron G3900 - £0.30 vs £0.50 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7302 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
280
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7302 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |