Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 2407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - £119.95 vs £126.47
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 23% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 123 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - £1.03 vs £1.20 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7399 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
123
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£126.47
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £126.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7399 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |