The Core i5-4670K is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900KS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-4670K
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 84 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i5-4670K vs Core i9-13900KS for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4670K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
183
82%
Min 1% FPS
122
83%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
224
100%
Min 1% FPS
147
100%
Price, £
£507.68
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.26/FPS
100%
Core i5-4670K vs Core i9-13900KS in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670K vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670K vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4670K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
84 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 6.0 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |