The Core i5-4670K is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-4670K
The Core i9-14900 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-14900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i5-4670K vs Core i9-14900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4670K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
183
84%
Min 1% FPS
122
85%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, £
£570.8
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.61/FPS
100%
Core i5-4670K vs Core i9-14900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670K vs Core i9-14900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670K vs Core i9-14900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4670K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 84 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
