Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 5900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 9 5900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 798 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 5900X.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 28% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 5900X - 606 vs 472 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £203.99 vs £453.91
- Up to 43% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900KS - £0.43 vs £0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 105 vs 150 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
606
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
57%
Price, £
£453.91
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for £453.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
472
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£203.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £203.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |