Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £117.95 vs £1179.89
- Up to 89% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £0.55 vs £5.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11400F - 230 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£117.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £117.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.13/FPS
11%
Price, £
£1179.89
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,179.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |