Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £117.95 vs £346.39
- Up to 63% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-13700K - £0.65 vs £1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-11400F - 196 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
182
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£117.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £117.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
196
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.77/FPS
37%
Price, £
£346.39
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |