Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - £119.95 vs £326.49
- Up to 53% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-14700KF - £0.37 vs £0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3900 - 412 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 28 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
322
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
412
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
47%
Price, £
£326.49
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for £326.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |