Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3051 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 101% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3900 - 274 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 28 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
136
50%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |