Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - £119.95 vs £204.00
- Up to 34% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 9 5900X - £0.73 vs £1.10 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 13% better in God of War than Celeron G3900 - 185 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |