Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1778 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G3900 - 221 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
207
93.66515837104072%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3763 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.665871121718375%
Multi-Core
992
8.030437950295473%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |