Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1615 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1840 - 143 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 53 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
139
97.2027972027972%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1840 Processor 2.8 GHz LGA1150 2 MB Cache Boxed CPU
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
40.89068825910931%
Multi-Core
854
11.529634129877143%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 250 W | TDP | 53 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
