Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 637 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G3930 - 223 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
215
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |