Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4570 - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £20.59 vs £315.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £0.16 vs £2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.48/FPS
6%
Price, £
£315
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
126
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£20.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4570 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |