Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G3900 - 590 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £124.48 vs £1049.89
- Up to 86% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £0.25 vs £1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
590
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.78/FPS
14%
Price, £
£1049.89
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,049.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
508
86%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£124.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £124.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 51 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |