Buy on Amazon
£235.38
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3900 - 116 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £124.48 vs £235.38
- Up to 33% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £1.35 vs £2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.03/FPS
67%
Price, £
£235.38
52%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 3 GHz - 8 Cores - 16 Threads - 96 MB Cache Memory - Socket AM4 - OEM
Buy for £235.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
92
79%
Value, £/FPS
£1.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£124.48
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 Dual-Core Processor (2 Core, 2.80 GHz)
Buy for £124.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
