Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2692 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 35% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3900 - 158 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
74%
Value, £/FPS
£1.06/FPS
100%
Price, £
£124.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £124.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |