Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-10700F - 234 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 54% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £1.03 vs £2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.23/FPS
46.18834080717489%
Price, £
FPS Winner
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
212
90.5982905982906%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
57.12260807937633%
Multi-Core
7231
41.36964357228675%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |