Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1785 days newer than Core i3-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-8300 - 133 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 57% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £1.68 vs £3.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 62 vs 120 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.92/FPS
42.857142857142854%
Price, £
FPS Winner
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
105
78.94736842105263%
Value, £/FPS
£1.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£176.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Single-Core
1301
46.10205527994331%
Multi-Core
3825
21.88340294067166%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 62 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |