Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 131 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 36% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-10105F - 266 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - £75.95 vs £279.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen 9 5950X - £0.39 vs £1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £279.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 454 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
196
74%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£75.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £75.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 453 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Vermeer | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |