Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - £75.95 vs £169.39
- Up to 47% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-12600KF - £0.10 vs £0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Valorant than Core i3-10105F - 911 vs 781 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
781
86%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£75.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £75.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
911
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
53%
Price, £
£169.39
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for £169.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |