Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - £75.95 vs £208.71
- Up to 59% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-12700K - £0.47 vs £1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10105F - 183 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£75.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £75.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.14/FPS
41%
Price, £
£208.71
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for £208.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |