Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1599 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 27% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 658 vs 519 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - £49.95 vs £259.98
- Up to 75% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 9 5900X - £0.1 vs £0.4 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £259.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2512 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
519
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |