Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 2399 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 245 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
222
90.61224489795919%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
38.1219341275403%
Multi-Core
3898
26.323608860075637%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |