Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 455 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 23 than Core i3-9100F - 231 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - £108.88 vs £180.63
- Up to 36% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - £0.5 vs £0.78 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
231
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
64%
Price, £
£180.63
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for £180.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
218
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |