Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 59% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 161 vs 101 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£68.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £68.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |