Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 798 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 209 vs 197 FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |