Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 930 days older than Ryzen 5 3550H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 3550H - 127 vs 125 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |