Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1099 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £89.95 vs £440.6
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900K - £0.37 vs £1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 3500X - 263 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
244
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£89.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.68/FPS
22%
Price, £
£440.6
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for £440.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 24th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |