Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3404 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 43% better in Rust than Core i5-4670K - 269 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £71.18 vs £454.02
- Up to 78% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900K - £0.38 vs £1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
269
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.69/FPS
22%
Price, £
£454.02
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for £454.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10661 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
188
69%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |