Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 42% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-8100 - 766 vs 538 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £69.99 vs £454.02
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-13900K - £0.13 vs £0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
766
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
22%
Price, £
£454.02
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for £454.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10659 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
538
70%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10660 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |