Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 50 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G4900 - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - £59.75 vs £175.0
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74371 minutes ago
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74370 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
58.27814569536424%
Multi-Core
1051
31.906496660595025%
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |