Buy on Amazon
£178.58
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1681 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-3330 - 114 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - £59.99 vs £178.58
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Desktop CPU - AM4/Hex Core/3.6GHz – 4GHZ turbo/ 16MB/95W
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76539 minutes ago
Intel i5-3330 Ivybridge Box Core i5 Processor (3GHz, 6MB Cache, Socket LGA 1155)
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
49.42119323241318%
Multi-Core
1643
34.47335291649182%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
