Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1681 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3330 - 102 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - £59.99 vs £178.58
- Up to 63% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 1600X - £0.65 vs £1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
102
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.75/FPS
37%
Price, £
£178.58
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |