Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 1758 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 182 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cezanne | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |