Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4300U is 1295 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 272 vs 269 FPS
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4300U - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
269
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 4300U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics 320SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
