Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3117 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6100 - 192 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |