Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £35.24 vs £143.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-10600K - £0.16 vs £0.56 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 15% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-6100 - 256 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for £143 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |