Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 2044 days older than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 15 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 3 3200U - 251 vs 234 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
251
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |