Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 480 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Ryzen 3 3200U - 202 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£68.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £68.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |