Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 800 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 3 3200U - 168 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen 3 3200U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
