Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1178 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 260 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
